Friday, March 02, 2007

Mars' Global Warming Simultaneous With Earth's

From National Geographic. As we've previously written, we believe firmly that there are no SUVs on Mars nor are there factories spewing out global warming producing gases. Yet, Mars' increase in temperatures seems to parallel our own pointing directly at the sun as the cause. So repeating an apparent natural cycle that has played out on Earth for Millenia.

Perhaps Al Gore can purchase some carbon credits for Mars and make us all feel better.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Global Warming Myth: Greenland's Glaciers are Shrinking

Al Gore's mockumentary, Inconvenient Truth, led the gullible to believe that New York City would be under 20 feet of ice by the year 2100. Even the United Nation's IPCC report had the increase of the world's oceans, at worst, to increase by seven inches in this time.

To real truth that is inconvenient to Mr. Bore, is satellite date showed Greenland was losing about 25 cubic miles of ice per year. This equates to about 0.4% per century.

Let us not forget that once, the Midwest of the United States, was under a sheet of ice a mile thick. That ice all melted long before the industrial age.

Science last month published a paper showing Greenland's ice loss had suddenly reversed. Perhaps that was due to Al Gore purchasing carbon offsets!

Science in another study found that ice was accumulating on Greenland's interior glaciers. 1

The National Center for Policy Analysis last year released a study that "average summer temperatures at the summit of the Greenland ice sheet have decreased 4 degrees Fahrenheit per decade since the late 1980s."

Lord Christoper Monckton, a environmental analyst from the UK, says the Greenland ice sheet "grew an average extra thickness of 2 inches a year" from 19930 to 2003.

The simple fact is Greenland was warmer when Eric the Red arrived in 986 with settlers. They had grape vines, cattle, grains, and other normal farming and horticultural activities. Then, the Little Ice Age began about the year 1400. Glaciers came and the vikings all but left.

We are in a natural cycle the Earth seems to undergo. Mars seems to be in this same phase according to NASA experiments.

With any luck, perhaps there will be new vinters producing some fine wines in Greenland.

1 Ola Johannessen - Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center - Bergen, Norway

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, February 08, 2007

Global warming is a farce

There are some socialist politicians and their media sycophants who attempt to hobble the United States' productivity by ceaselessly trumpeting the effects of so-called global warming.

There are many scientists who believe there is no global warming. There are others who are not sure whether or not global warming exists but if there is global warming they are not certain that it is caused by man's activities. Yet, we are all to blindly and hysterically sign the Kyoto Treaty and cripple our economic production while China, India, and Russia are exempted from this treaty.

Some scientists believe, and this belief is gaining ground because of the over-whelming evidence, that the Earth undergoes natural cycles of heating and cooling relatively unaffected by man's activities. Although there have been some recent years of higher temperatures, overall, the planet heated up mostly up until 1940 after which, as a whole, the global temperature has cooled. No one would know this from the media (except during the 1970's when we were supposed to be undergoing global cooling).

Incidentally, the recent years of higher Earth temperatures parallel higher temperatures on Mars. Scientists do believe with some certainty that there are no factories or SUVS on Mars. What has occurred during this time is an increase in solar activity.

In any event, as the attached link reveals in an article, even the UN does not agree in regards to global warming in spite of the cherry picked propaganda regurgitated without question by the media. Trained as a scientist, I am sceptical by nature, especially when those who are receiving large grants are the most vocal in regards to global warming. Follow the money, always.http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=156df7e6-d490-41c9-8b1f-106fef8763c6&k=0

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Add to Technorati Favorites