Pelosi's Pompous Political Pacifist Pinkos

Reportedly, the extreme (even more extreme left than Madame Pelosi) Maxine Waters and other leftists got into a closed door shout match with Mrs. Pelosi. It seems there are some who really do want us to lose in Iraq and withdraw. Waters is one of these losers in every sense of the word.

Pelosi, faced with political realities and stymied when her hack John Murtha's "slow bleed" tactic was revealed to the press, can't withdraw from Iraq. The left is up in arms with the Democratic leadership. It was written in this very blog less than two weeks ago that the strategy for Republicans to win in '08 is to agitate the left.

The left, acting with emotions and not logic, is easy to upset. The left thought that if Pelosi became Speaker, they could prevail and cause us to lose the Iraq war.

Stopping their evil and naive plans are not only the American populace who wants to win and believes we can win, but also Blue Dog Democrats in the tradition of the old Democratic Harry Truman Party, not of the current Stalinist Party.

The left got themselves into this mess. You get what you voted for; people who have no morals and integrity can't be trusted to vote the way they say they would. You on the left didn't really expect Pelosi to keep her promises, did you?

Heads I Win, Tails I Win

The fundamental goal of the Democrap Party is clear; embarrass the president of the United States.

After news of Murtha's "slow-bleed" strategy was revealed on this blog and other outlets, the democraps have come up with a new strategy: micromanagement of the war effort.

If the president's troop surge plan works, the democraps can date the turnaround to when they started "managing defeat."

If the president's troop surge plan does not work, they have further ammunition against the president.

Speaker Pelosi has not kept her campaign promises to date. We can, however, expect her and the others like Murtha who wish America to lose to relentlessly continue on their destructive path.

Cheney: "I'm not backing down" to Pelosi

Following is the full text and link to a Newsmax.com article from the Associated Presss.

Vice president Cheney is too kind, I not only question Pelosi and Murtha's judgement, but also their allegiance and patriotism.

Cheney: I Question Pelosi's Policy Judgment

Vice President Dick Cheney refused Friday to take back his charge that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's opposition to President Bush's Iraq war buildup is playing into the hands of the al-Qaida terrorist network.

"If you're going to advocate a course of action that basically is withdrawal of our forces from Iraq, then you don't get to just do the fun part of that, that says, 'We'll, we're going to get out,' and appeal to your constituents on that basis," Cheney said.

The vice president had voiced the same criticism of Pelosi earlier this week during a visit to Japan, and the California Democrat accused the vice president of questioning her patriotism, saying she was going to call President Bush directly with her complaint.

"I hope the president will repudiate and distance himself from the vice president's remarks," Pelosi said. She ended up talking with White House chief of staff Josh Bolten instead of Bush.

The long-distance quarrel began in Tokyo, where Cheney earlier this week used an interview to criticize Pelosi and Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., over their plan to place restrictions on Bush's request for an additional $93 billion for the Iraq war to make it difficult or impossible to send 21,500 extra troops to Iraq.

During Friday's interview in Sydney, Cheney said, "I'm not sure what part of it is that Nancy disagreed with. She accused me of questioning her patriotism. I didn't question her patriotism. I questioned her judgment."

"You also have to be accountable for the results. What are the consequences of that? What happens if we withdraw from Iraq?," he said. "And the point I made and I'll make it again is that al-Qaida functions on the basis that they think they can break our will. That's their fundamental underlying strategy, that if they can kill enough Americans or cause enough havoc, create enough chaos in Iraq, then we'll quit and go home. And my statement was that if we adopt the Pelosi policy, that then we will validate the strategy of al-Qaida. I said it and I meant it."

Asked if he was willing to take back his criticism of Pelosi, Cheney replied, "I'm not backing down."

© 2007 Associated Press.

Weekly Traitor To America: Democrat Party House Members

There were beliefs that Democrats were in two camps in regards to the war in Iraq: 1) They did not want America to win, or 2) They neither wanted America to win or lose but to drag the war out for political reasons.

Either option is reprehensible and in actuality, traitorous.

New proof of these Democrat Party tactics emerged this week as Democrats in the House aided by extreme anti-war groups are attempting to subvert the war effort. The sole purpose is to ensure that we do not win so as to gain political advantage.

Rep. John Murtha has joined with the jet-setting Nancy Pelosi to introduce riders onto bills that would severely limit the president's options as to troop deployments and rotations.

"What we have staked out is a campaign to stop the war without cutting off funding" for the troops, said Tom Mazzie of Americans Against Escalation of the War in Iraq. "We call it the 'readiness strategy.'"

Please see the attached link for more information.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0207/2751.html

I am so filled with disgust that I will withhold further comment on this matter until tomorrow.

Había las creencias que demócratas estuvieron en dos campos con respecto a la guerra en Iraq: 1) Ellos no quisieron que América ganara, ni 2) Ellos ni América querida ganar ni perder pero sacar la guerra para razones políticas.
Cualquier opción es reprensible y en la realidad, traidor.
Nueva prueba de estas tácticas del Partido de demócrata surgió esta semana como demócratas ayudaron en casa por grupos pacifistas extremos procuran subvertir el esfuerzo de la guerra. El único propósito es de asegurar que nosotros no ganemos para ganar la ventaja política.
Representante. John Murtha ha unido con el Nancy Pelosi del jet set para introducir a jinetes en cuentas que limitarían severamente las opciones de presidente en cuanto a despliegues de tropa y rotaciones.
"Lo que hemos marcado con estacas es una campaña de parar la guerra sin cortar la financiación" para las tropas, dijo Tom Mazzie de Americanos Contra la Escalada de la Guerra en Iraq. "Nosotros le llamamos la "estrategia de prontitud"."
Vea por favor la conexión conectada para más información.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0207/2751.html
Yo tan soy llenado de repugno que retendré el comentario adicional en este asunto hasta mañana.

Pelosi's Plush Pricey Plane or, Murtha's Menacing Message

Speaker of the House Pelosi has sought from the Air Force a plane to use for official business. The Air Force has, since September 11th, provided an aircraft for the Speaker of the House. The Speaker follows the Vice-President in line of succession to the President.

There is little question the Speaker of the House should have such a plane. The problem is, Speaker Pelosi reportedly demanded a 757!

The 757 has 42 seats alone for business class. With a crew of sixteen, it would cost $300,000 per trip to Pelosi's district or $600,000 round-trip. The round-trip costs to and from Washington DC if taken weekly as is common would cost taxpayers about $30,000,000 per year.

Dennis Hastert, the prior Speaker of the House, was furnished and accepted a Gulfstream.

The Democrats' mantra pre-election was that they were going to clean-up Washington. It seems they really are cleaning up because in addition to Pelosi's demands, Rep. John Murtha who has had significant ethics troubles of his own in the past, ominously released a statement reminding the Air Force who is in charge of the Air Force's budget.

Tony Soprano couldn't do better than this crowd.