Terrible, Terrible News for Five Million Liberals

http://newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/3/20/83629.shtml?s=lh

Republican's Spineless

Incomprehensible is Republicans understand that we are at war and understand what kind of an enemy we are facing. We know we must attack terrorists on many different fronts including militarily, diplomatically with other nations, and financially for our terrorist enemies are relentless.

So too, are the internal enemies of America who are similarly relentless in their attacks. Democrats.

Republicans can support killing and capturing terrorists because we understand the enemy we face but yet Republicans do not see the internal enemy before them. How can this be? How can so called Senator Schumer create a scandal out of nothing and Republicans try to get along?

Senator Schumer, aided by the national media, made it appear as if the president and his staff did something wrong by firing eight federal prosecutors. This ability is a constitutional allowance. In fact, the Clinton so called administration fired 93 of 94 federal prosecutors in 1993.

Perhaps Republicans were afraid to get between Senator Schumer and a television camera.

I suggest, that if soldiers and Marines can daily face enemy attacks, Republicans can find the backbones to stand up to the lies, distortions, and half-truths.

Republicans can't wait for the left to disintegrate. We must attack and defend.

Democrats Betrayed

Democrats. Comrades! You voted in November for bringing the troops home. Instead, your leaders in Congress have voted for meaningless non-binding resolutions that mean nothing except to encourage our enemies.

Instead of bringing the troops home, your party leaders have voted for pork projects added to bills in the dark of night. You get meaningless rhetoric and no results.

Congratulations. When you vote for people who have no internal moral compass, you get what you voted for. Nothing.

How does that make you feel?

Hillary Buys The Black Vote

The discredited Hillary Clinton's campaign reached a deal in the last several days to pay the "consulting" firm of South Carolina state Sen. Darrell Jackson who is a prominent and key black political leader

The reported bribe, errr, consulting fees are $10,000 a month each month through the 2008 elections. The total amount expected to be paid exceeds $200,000.

Barack Hussein Osama Obama's campaign had been in talks with Mr. Jackson's consulting firm but had reportedly only offered a bribe, errrr, consulting fee of $5,000 per month.

The cold, frosty, and calculating Clinton realizes Support from black voters is key in South Carolina, where 49 percent of the Democratic presidential primary vote came from blacks in 2004. The state will host the first Southern primaries for both the Democrats and the GOP in 2008, according to a Newsmax.com story gained from campaign information and information from the press.

Weekly Traitor To America: Democrat Party House Members

There were beliefs that Democrats were in two camps in regards to the war in Iraq: 1) They did not want America to win, or 2) They neither wanted America to win or lose but to drag the war out for political reasons.

Either option is reprehensible and in actuality, traitorous.

New proof of these Democrat Party tactics emerged this week as Democrats in the House aided by extreme anti-war groups are attempting to subvert the war effort. The sole purpose is to ensure that we do not win so as to gain political advantage.

Rep. John Murtha has joined with the jet-setting Nancy Pelosi to introduce riders onto bills that would severely limit the president's options as to troop deployments and rotations.

"What we have staked out is a campaign to stop the war without cutting off funding" for the troops, said Tom Mazzie of Americans Against Escalation of the War in Iraq. "We call it the 'readiness strategy.'"

Please see the attached link for more information.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0207/2751.html

I am so filled with disgust that I will withhold further comment on this matter until tomorrow.

Había las creencias que demócratas estuvieron en dos campos con respecto a la guerra en Iraq: 1) Ellos no quisieron que América ganara, ni 2) Ellos ni América querida ganar ni perder pero sacar la guerra para razones políticas.
Cualquier opción es reprensible y en la realidad, traidor.
Nueva prueba de estas tácticas del Partido de demócrata surgió esta semana como demócratas ayudaron en casa por grupos pacifistas extremos procuran subvertir el esfuerzo de la guerra. El único propósito es de asegurar que nosotros no ganemos para ganar la ventaja política.
Representante. John Murtha ha unido con el Nancy Pelosi del jet set para introducir a jinetes en cuentas que limitarían severamente las opciones de presidente en cuanto a despliegues de tropa y rotaciones.
"Lo que hemos marcado con estacas es una campaña de parar la guerra sin cortar la financiación" para las tropas, dijo Tom Mazzie de Americanos Contra la Escalada de la Guerra en Iraq. "Nosotros le llamamos la "estrategia de prontitud"."
Vea por favor la conexión conectada para más información.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0207/2751.html
Yo tan soy llenado de repugno que retendré el comentario adicional en este asunto hasta mañana.

Hillary proves she is a communist

Hillary the communist revealed her true self in a speech shown recently on C-Span. She said, "The Democrats know what needs to be done again (sic) we're working to push this agenda forward. The other day the oil companies reported the highest profits in the History of the world. I wanna take those profits and I want to put those profits in a strategic energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart energy. Alternative and (sic) technology that will begin to actually move us towards energy independence."

Hugo Chavez was rightfully denounced (although the Democrat Party was silent) for nationalizing the oil companies in Venezuela. "Taking" profits, funds, or money from a company and redistributing these monies is socialism, at best, and communism at worst.

Hillary and company seem to be doing their best to help terrorists. If the terrorists win in Iraq, they will control a large source of oil and so oil profits will substantially reduce for legitimate companies. Thus, Hillary will not have funds to "take."

What is "smart energy?" Answer: smart energy, along with any word with the word, "smart" preceding the word is a deliberately vague term that a politician will use to fool non-smart people. Believe anything with "smart" in it as used by a politician at your own peril (and pocketbook).

Do we really want a politician to "take" any company's profits? Profits are re-invested in the company for growth and / or sent to shareholders in the form of dividends and / or increased share prices as a reward for their risks in buying the stock. Taking profits from a successful company is all risk and since there is no reward for the shareholder or the company, the taking of profits is bad for business and bad for an economy.